Supreme Court Denies Review in AI Authorship Case

paulnicolai5
Aug 11
1 min read

The Supreme Court has declined to review a lower court opinion that affirmed the US Copyright Office requirement of human authorship to be eligible for copyright protection.

The case involved a piece of visual art created entirely by an AI system. The computer scientist did not edit or alter the final AI-generated image. The AI system was listed as the sole author.

WHY THIS IS IMPORTANT…as of now, AI-generated materials are not eligible for US copyright protection.

Recent Posts

See All

Standards and Frameworks as Contract Measures of Performance

Using appropriate standards and frameworks add foreseeability to technology-driven contracts

No Solicits Join Noncompetes in Coming Under Scrutiny

Even Delaware courts are applying increasing scrutiny to restrictive covenants, including no solicitation provisions, even in a business sale.

Plausible Sexual Harassment Allegation Bars Arbitration

The US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has ruled that when a complaint plausibly alleges sexual harassment, the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act can prevent

Comments