top of page
  • Writer's picturePaul Peter Nicolai

Product Disparagement Claim Survives

Updated: May 19, 2023

A medical device company that designs and manufactures customized hip and knee replacements sued an insurance company that characterized customized total knee replacements as experimental and investigational. The lower court dismissed the case. The decision was partially overturned on appeal, and the case was reinstated.

WHY THIS IS IMPORTANT…the insurer’s plans provided reimbursement for the system from 2011 until 2018, when it released a revised policy that considered customized total knee replacements as experimental and investigational. The product in question had FDA approval. Because the court found that the policy statement could be read as a verifiable assertion that the system is not clinically effective and not accepted by doctors and insurance providers as a standard treatment, the product disparagement case was reinstated.

Recent Posts

See All

Non-Contract Claims Allowed Despite Contract

A plaintiff sued for contract damages, unjust enrichment, and what is called a quasi-contract concerning services he provided to a company. The company argued the parties had a fully integrated indepe

Land Sale Contract Overridden

A person sold a piece of land with a side agreement that said that, under certain circumstances, they could repurchase the property at a fixed price. Later, through an e-mail exchange, a different dea

Commentaires


bottom of page