• Paul Peter Nicolai

Deadlock Does Not Mean Dissolution

Updated: Jun 17

A 50% shareholder sued to have the corporation dissolved because of irreconcilable differences with the other 50% owner. The court dismissed the claim because there was no proof of irreparable injury to the corporation.


Why This Is Important… Massachusetts, like most states, does not dissolve corporations because of a shareholder deadlock standing alone. It has to be shown that the shareholder deadlock has caused irreparable injury due to severe corporate dysfunction or frustration of purpose. Even though the shareholders were in deadlock, the corporation was still functioning and making money in this particular case.


Recent Posts

See All

A bankruptcy judge has been asked to decide whether an employee of a cannabis business is ineligible for Chapter 13 relief because his income comes from an industry still illegal under federal law. Th

The Massachusetts Supreme Court has ruled that the dispute over whether plaintiffs who entered into franchise agreements to operate convenience stores have been misclassified as independent contractor