• Paul Peter Nicolai

Deadlock Does Not Mean Dissolution

Updated: Jun 17

A 50% shareholder sued to have the corporation dissolved because of irreconcilable differences with the other 50% owner. The court dismissed the claim because there was no proof of irreparable injury to the corporation.

Why This Is Important… Massachusetts, like most states, does not dissolve corporations because of a shareholder deadlock standing alone. It has to be shown that the shareholder deadlock has caused irreparable injury due to severe corporate dysfunction or frustration of purpose. Even though the shareholders were in deadlock, the corporation was still functioning and making money in this particular case.

Recent Posts

See All

An arbitration agreement that requires parties to waive federal statutory claims is unenforceable. According to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, limiting a plaintiff’s claims to those

According to one federal appellate court, just visiting a website may be consent to a binding arbitration agreement. A retailer contended a reference on the back of the cards to an arbitration provisi