top of page

Profit-Sharing Agreement Not Covered By Payment Of Wages Act

  • paulnicolai5
  • Mar 17
  • 1 min read

A former employee sued, claiming that failing to pay amounts owed under a profit-sharing agreement violated the Massachusetts payment of wages law, which provides for mandatory triple damages. The court dismissed the case. The employee argued that the profit-sharing agreement was tied to revenues and thus constituted a commission subject to the law. The court rejected that argument because the plan expressly entitled the employee to a share of profits, not a percentage of revenues he personally generated. That is not a commission protected by the Wage Act.

 

WHY THIS IS IMPORTANT…Unless a payment plan entitles an employee to a percentage of revenue generated by the employee, it is not a commission. If it is not wages, a commission, or a bonus that is locked and payable, it is not covered by the Payment of Wages Act. Here, because it was based on profits, it was outside the law.


Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page