• Paul Peter Nicolai

FLSA v. State Law

A jury awarded damages to a group of employees under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and the Massachusetts Wage Act even though there was no violation of state law. No overtime rule under state law applied to restaurants. State law requires the payment of triple damages, while the FLSA only allows for double the amount due. The Massachusetts Supreme Court ruled that the FLSA rules applied to the exclusion of the state remedy.

Why This Is Important…Effectively, this ruling prevents applying the more liberal state damage rule to a claim limited to federal law. Since there was no overtime requirement under federal state law, only federal law could provide the remedy. Although important, this ruling is limited to cases where federal law provides a right that state law does not provide, which is rare.

Recent Posts

See All

A former employee sued her former employer for trying to enforce a restrictive covenant preventing her from practicing her profession entirely for one year from her date of separation. The court refus

A developer’s request to construct a solar energy system was denied because an access road to the facility through Waltham was a commercial use in a residential zone. Because state law protects solar

The Massachusetts Supreme Court has ruled that their all-risk property insurance policies did not cover business losses sustained by restaurants due to COVID-19. The court said the policies provide th