top of page
  • Paul Peter Nicolai

Uber Arbitration Agreement Tossed

Updated: Feb 9, 2021

The Massachusetts Supreme Court has ruled that Uber's customer terms and conditions requiring them to arbitrate claims against Uber are unenforceable. No enforceable contract requiring arbitration had been formed. Massachusetts joins several other states ruling the Uber arbitration agreement is unenforceable .

Why This Is Important... The Massachusetts decision joins others on this issue. This particular arbitration agreement is unenforceable because Uber could not prove there was reasonable notice of the arbitration agreement and manifested consent to it. The reason it could not do so is that both the notice and consent were obscured in the registration process .

Uber also reserved onto itself the right to change the terms and conditions without notice to users who had previously agreed. Even if a user found out about a change, they had no ability to object or opt out.

As we have previously noted, most of these cases are fought on the issue of being able to show there was reasonable notice and consent to an arbitration agreement.

Recent Posts

See All

Over the last two decades, over two-thirds of the states have passed laws authorizing the use of marijuana for medical purposes by persons with debilitating conditions. Over one-third of the states ha

A plaintiff withheld an email saying the attorney-client privilege protected it. The plaintiff’s CEO received the email from the company’s in-house counsel. The CEO forwarded the email to a hotel fron

A court of appeals affirmed the district court’s ruling by concluding that emails were judicial records to which the common law right of access to judicial proceedings was attached. Since the public’s

bottom of page