|










 |
|
August 1, 2002
Subject: Trade Secret Records Retention
Almost any notion giving a company a competitive advantage can be a trade
secret. Trade secrets are governed by state law and the definitions of a
trade secret vary. Most states use some version of the Uniform Trade
Secrets Act (UTSA). Under UTSA, a trade secret is any information not
commonly known and that could give a company an advantage over its
competitors. Additionally, a company must take reasonable steps to protect
the secrecy of the information. Secret formulas used for many consumer
products including cola and candy are examples of well-known trade
secrets. Other common trade secrets include customer lists, corporate
financial information, marketing data, and technical and organizational
information.
Maintaining a trade secret requires complete and accurate records of
confidential information and the protection procedures taken to safeguard
it from disclosure.
Records Used to Identify Elements of a Trade Secret
Maintaining adequate documentation establishing the existence of the trade
secret's elements is critical for a trade secrets records retention
system. The UTSA says a trade secret is:
- information;
- that derives independent actual or potential
economic value
- from not being generally known to, and not readily
- ascertainable by proper means by other persons who
can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use; and
- is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under
the circumstances to maintain its secrecy.
Information
Information can be a trade secret whatever its form.
New products, pricing, income, corporate objectives, internal discussions
about future markets, conceptual product designs, prototypes, competitive
analyses, sales data, product profile data, and marketing themes have all
been ruled to be trade secrets.
Information from public sources or gained through experience is usually
not eligible for protection. Because matters of public or general trade
knowledge can never be trade secrets, it is critical to maintain records
with detailed descriptions of information considered trade secrets. It is
helpful to list all confidential information with references to more
detailed descriptions in separate documents. A particular customer list
could be noted on a comprehensive list of trade secrets with a reference
to another report with the actual customer names, the measures used to
protect the list, confidentiality agreements for that particular list, the
time and effort expended to develop the list, and other applicable
information.
Economic Value
UTSA recognizes the secret must have economic value to be protectable. It
does not require proving competitive advantage. Most courts consider the
usefulness of the information in a particular business to decide whether
alleged confidential information is protectable. Courts have ruled that
spending considerable amounts of time, money, and effort in producing the
information were strong evidence of economic value.
Records documenting the resources dedicated to creating and maintaining
the confidential information, help establish that the information has
economic value. Records showing other companies have licensed, or have
been interested in licensing the information, prove the information has
economic value.
Secrecy
The key question in trade secret misappropriation trials is whether the
company took sufficient steps to protect its information. Without good
records documenting protection efforts, a company might not prove the
stolen information was a trade secret.
There is no such thing as trade secret information in the abstract.
Absolute secrecy is not required to protect a trade secret. The trade
secret holder must use reasonable efforts to maintain secrecy, but may
release the secret to those also pledged to secrecy.
Courts generally look at these elements to decide whether the secrecy
element has been met:
- the extent to which the information is known
outside the company;
- the extent to which it is known by employees and
others in the company;
- the extent of the measures taken to guard the
secrecy of the information;
- the value of the information to the company and its
competitors;
- the amount of effort or money spent developing the
information; and
- how easily the information could be properly gotten
or duplicated by others.
Documenting Trade Secret Protection Measures
Research and Development
When developing something that may eventually become a patent, trade
secret protection is available during the invention process, assuming the
elements of a trade secret exist. Detailed record keeping is critical to
the invention process because independent creation is a defense against
trade secret misappropriation claims. Records documenting ideas, concepts,
theories, experiments, and test results need to be kept. These records
prove the date an idea was conceived and its independent creation.
Organizations doing R & D need to maintain close ties to external
technical communities. There are constant informal technical exchanges and
formal joint ventures. Administration and oversight of these exchanges has
to be centralized to control their number, the areas of technology
discussed, and counseling the people involved so that proprietary
information is not improperly revealed. The control point should be
responsible for the maintaining records of technical exchanges with
outsiders.
Formal joint ventures require contracts that define the joint work, the
protections for proprietary information, publication procedures, and the
rights in any created trade secrets. In some companies, information is
prepared specifically for release to scientific and technical communities
and the public. Procedures governing the review and approvals for release
of papers and talks should be established and records of all ownership
issues, press releases, and presentations should be maintained and
organized centrally. Access to records on these potential trade secrets
should be safeguarded by procedures that limit access to authorized users.
Physical Security
Physical security is very important. Without some physical security
procedures, a company will generally fail to prove it took reasonable
measures to protect trade secrets.
The amount of security needed depends on the value of the trade secrets.
Every company with trade secrets should maintain records on the security
measures it uses to protect its confidential information. Depending on the
extent of a company's trade secret assets, physical security measures that
need to be considered include:
- Access to Grounds
- Building Access
- Access by Repair and Service People
- Access to Areas in the Plant or Office
In all situations, access to trade secret
information should be on a need-to-know basis. All employees do not need
access to all information. Passwords can protect information from
unauthorized personnel. They should be changed periodically and every time
a key employee with access leaves the company. Company records should show
which employees are authorized to know which trade secrets. Documents
showing access to these secrets should be maintained for each authorized
employee.
Documents containing trade secrets should be clearly labeled. There should
be clear procedures for having access to them. Someone should be in charge
of them; they should be signed out by people who are allowed to access
them; no copies should be made; they should never be taken home by anyone;
and they should be returned and accounted for.
Employee technical publications should be screened and documented. Many
trade secrets are innocently given away through publications or delivery
of papers to professional associations.
Plant tours should be controlled and documented so visitors do not see
trade secret operations. Make sure that sales staffs do not take customers
to areas where confidential information may be seen. Make sure purchasers
do not allow vendors to come into restricted areas unless appropriate
contracts have been signed. A record of tours conducted, for whom, with
dates and times should be kept along with instances where requests for
tours were denied. These records are useful to prove that measures were
taken to protect secrecy.
Employees
Ninety percent of the loss of trade secrets problem comes from employees
who leave to work for a competitor or leave to form a competing company.
Proprietary information can be lost by inadvertent disclosure besides
theft.
Here are some things that should be done to reduce the risk of employees
taking your trade secrets with them. All these should be documented and
kept in a secure records retention system.
Employment Agreements
Employers use employment agreements to prevent trade secret and other
confidential information disclosure by requiring an employee to promise
not to reveal particular confidential information or to work for a
competitor. Whether they are enforceable requires courts to balance
between free trade and the protection of valuable trade secrets.
An employee is free to quit a job and join a competitor or start a
business, unless
- there is a valid contract in which the employee has
agreed not to do so; or
- the employee takes the employer's trade secrets and
uses them to compete with it.
The noncompetition agreement and the nonuse of trade
secrets agreements are the two most common types of restrictive covenants.
Records of employment agreements should be maintained in personnel files.
They provide concrete, written evidence of a trade secret's existence and
company efforts at protecting them.
Nondisclosure Agreements
The purpose of a nondisclosure agreement is to protect trade secrets. The
agreement says an employee will not reveal trade secrets to a future
employer. Nondisclosure agreements can prohibit employees from revealing
trade secret information forever, any place, to anyone.
Noncompetition Agreements
A noncompetition agreement forbids the employee from working for a
competitor. The agreement generally includes limits like time periods,
geographic restrictions, and defined restricted activity. These limits
must be reasonable for the agreement to be enforced. The company must have
a legitimate interest for the agreement, it must be supported by valid
consideration, and its terms must be reasonable.
An advantage of a signed nondisclosure agreement is it allows the company
to monitor its trade secrets. If the employee goes to work for a
competitor, the company can make the employee and the competitor focus on
the trade secret issue and perhaps get sufficient protection to assure the
employee will not reveal trade secrets to the competitor. If there is a
noncompetition agreement, it can prevent the employee from working for the
competitor in an atmosphere likely to involve trade secret disclosure by
virtue of the environment the employee works in. Because these agreements
may be used to protect confidential information even after an employee has
left the company, it is critical that records of these agreements are
maintained well after an employee is gone.
The Initial Interview
Protecting trade secrets should start at the interview. Applicants should
be told the company has trade secrets and they should be asked if they
will agree to keep it secret. They should be asked to sign a statement to
this effect. All employees, in whatever capacity, should be asked to sign
this kind of form. All this does is ask for nondisclosure of trade
secrets. You are entitled to prohibit employees from revealing trade
secrets to anyone any time, anywhere. A record of the initial interview
should be maintained in the personnel file.
The Exit Interview
The exit interview is very important. Now that the employee is leaving
your risk of loss of information is highest. Make sure the employee
re-acknowledges and resigns the document signed at hire promising
nondisclosure of trade secrets. Now that the employee has had access to
the information, you can be specific. You should identify what information
the employee has access to that you want him or her to promise not to
disclose. You should make sure you get all documents, including
information stored on computer disks, back from the employee with a signed
statement saying that all such documents have been returned, no copies
were made, no documents or copies went home, and no documents or copies
have been given to anyone else.
If the employee is going to a competitor, consider a letter to the
competitor saying the former employee had access to trade secrets, and
that there is an obligation not to divulge any confidential information to
the new employer. This will prove the new employer had knowledge that its
new employee was privy to trade secret information of a competitor. Even
without an express agreement protecting trade secrets, confidential
information may still be protected by virtue of the employment
relationship.
Non-employees
When non-employees perform services, they may see secret information. If
trade secrets are not adequately protected, it is possible an independent
contractor will take confidential information and use it for his or her
own benefit or for a competitor.
The business must have procedures and standard agreement forms to protect
from loss of proprietary information through these routes. There must be
service contracts with the employers of these people, but the business
should also get a signed commitment from each individual with respect to
proprietary information. Records of all these agreements should be
maintained and updated.
Idea Submissions
Companies often get unsolicited ideas. An idea submitter will claim they
have a great idea to present to the company. Standard company procedure
should require anyone submitting an unsolicited idea to waive, in writing,
any confidential relationship and limit their rights to whatever trade
secret protection they may have.
Another way a company can receive unrequested ideas is in negotiations.
Many companies do not have standard forms on disclosure of ideas or
confidential information during negotiations. The law says that if a
company negotiates with a party and subsequently uses information received
in the negotiations to its benefit, the company might be liable for
misappropriating the information.
It is essential to develop some type of record to document idea
submissions and store them in a centralized location. The fact that an
Idea Submission Form to be completed was sent, that the department in
charge of unsolicited ideas was separate from the rest of the company, and
ideas sent to the company are kept under lock and key help proves the
affirmative defense of independent creation later.
Additionally, product development people should keep sufficient records so
that, if necessary, they can show the dates of their work, their progress
on new products, and any other information that would go to the basic
point of showing that your company knew of the idea or suggestion being
submitted before the submission by the outsider.
Internet Use
Companies must protect their trade secrets from on-line exposure. More
company information is now being posted on company Web pages. A company
must maintain reasonable safeguards to protect proprietary information on
the Internet as it would in any other location.
Information posted on a company Web site should be documented, with times
and dates, and any Web site audits should be recorded and archived. One
way to prevent trade secrets from being disclosed on-line is to have a
complete and timely record of all information contained on a Web site. In
case of an accidental posting of confidential information or intentional
posting by a disgruntled employee, a company could quickly identify this
material and remove it. While an argument can be made that once a trade
secret is posted, its secrecy is lost, courts have ruled that timely
removal of confidential information may save its trade secret status.
Government Submissions
Another place where trade secret information leaks out is in submission to
the federal government. Almost all businesses of any size are required to
submit extensive information to many different government agencies under
many different laws. This information is of great value to competitors
seeking to strengthen their competitive position. Some laws provide for a
certain amount of protection against the exposure of trade secrets upon
submission to the government. The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) has an
exemption that allows an agency to withhold trade secrets and commercial
or financial information from disclosure pursuant to an FOIA request.
It is important to monitor and record all information submitted to the
government. This is obvious, but it is sometimes overlooked simply because
there are so many agencies requesting so much information.
Even if an express written agreement from the government to protect
identified information cannot be obtained, the company can mark trade
secret and confidential information it submits to the government. When the
clerk is going through it to satisfy an FOIA request, they will at least
have that information pointed out, and may not give it to the requester.
Economic Espionage Act
The Economic Espionage Act (EEA) is a federal criminal statute on stealing
proprietary commercial information. The EEA creates the crime of
wrongfully copying or otherwise controlling trade secrets. The act must be
committed with intent to benefit another person or a foreign government or
entity, or to disadvantage the rightful owner of the information.
Companies get EEA protection from acts of piracy by those who steal trade
secrets for profit or revenge. The EEA is intended to deter trade secret
crimes, and help their investigation and prosecution.
In an EEA case, companies can help prosecutors by supplying records
relating to the trade secret. The EEA has its own definition of a trade
secret that is an element of the crime. Records establishing the existence
of these secrets are essential to successfully prosecuting an EEA case. An
EEA case defendant must be shown to have intentionally stolen the secret.
Providing prosecutors with records that show access by the defendant and
records showing the person was aware of the information's trade secret
status is also critical.
Trade Secrets Record Audit
The audit should review all documents that identify a company's trade
secrets, who has access to them, and the security measures taken to
protect them. The audit should confirm that records are being maintained
according to policy and that their access is limited to authorized
personnel.
|